Crítica a la tesis heideggeriana de reducción del Dios Cristiano a la diferencia ontolótica

Abstract

Starting from the ontological difference between Being and beings, Martin Heidegger produced a startling critique of the concept of the Christian God, considering it as a mere consequence of Platonic-Aristotelian philosophy, which made us forget about the question of the meaning of Being. This metaphysical endeavor will be defined as onto-theo-logy, and will provide us with a discourse about God as a being-cause of the existence of the totality of beings. This discourse will be assimilated to the Christian God. In M. Heidegger, the Christian God will be considered as an entity and, because of that, He is conditioned by the revealing of Being. 

Our intention is to produce a critique of the Heideggerian thesis of the Christian God as reduced to the ontological difference and conditioned by the Being, starting from the views of the French philosopher Jean Luc Marion expressed in his work God without being (1982). J. L. Marion shows us that the Christian God can go beyond onto-theo-logy. The Biblical God called agapé is indifferent to the ontic difference and to the ontological difference. This indifference allows the concept of God to be free from the ruling of the Being. From this liberation, God will determine Being/beings, creating an irreducible distance between them.